🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."